Interfaith Statement · 2005
A Statement Regarding Muslim–Christian Perspectives on the Nuclear Weapons Danger
Convened by
Islamic Society of North America
Managing the Atom Project, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Churches’ Center for Theology and Public Policy
Background
The Consultation
A group of religious leaders and scholars — Muslims, Christians and others — was convened by the Islamic Society of North America, the Managing the Atom Project of the Kennedy School of Government of Harvard University, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Churches’ Center for Theology and Public Policy.
The group met at the Pocantico Conference Center of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund in Tarrytown, New York on 23–25 May 2005, to discuss what their traditions had to contribute to the question of the nuclear weapons danger at this time in history. The consultation produced the following statement, which religious leaders of all faiths are urged to endorse.
The Statement
We Affirm Our Belief in the One God
Nine affirmations agreed by the Muslim and Christian participants of the Pocantico consultation.
- We affirm our belief in the One God, the Creator and Sustainer of the universe.
- We agree that the Christian and Muslim traditions are unambiguous on the sanctity of human life and on the protection of all forms of creation, including the environment. We believe in the dignity of all human beings and their roles as trustees and humble custodians of the earth and their responsibility for the needs of future generations.
- We believe that chemical, biological and particularly nuclear weapons do not discriminate between combatants and non-combatants and inevitably destroy innocent human life, even as they destroy other forms of life such as animals and vegetation, cause irrevocable damage to the environment for many generations to come and cause human suffering and disease. Therefore, we hold that these weapons are contrary to our religious and ethical principles.
- We agree that the ideal response to the nuclear threat is a total and universal ban on all such weapons, including low yield tactical nuclear weapons, their development, production, possession, acquisition, deployment, use, and the threat of use. We hold further that any weakening of the nuclear “Non-Proliferation Treaty” is a setback for world peace.
- We agree that all nations, without exception, must abide by international treaties, agreements and other international covenants of which they are signatories.
- We further agree that the possession of nuclear weapons is an unacceptable risk for the human community in these times and is a continuing threat to the entire planet and its fragile ecosystem. The risk of theft of nuclear weapons or materials by non-state actors for nuclear terrorism as well as the continuing risk of accidental use of nuclear weapons by nation states themselves makes even the possession of nuclear weapons a danger to God’s creation.
- We agree that the enormous resources spent on nuclear weapons can be put to much better use to deal with the problems of poverty, disease and ignorance and to promote a peaceful pluralistic civil society, free of hate and prejudice.
- We encourage engagement on the part of civil society in the debate and policy making decisions relating to nuclear weapons.
- We therefore believe that the common position held by both of our traditions, expressed as the sanctity of human life, leads us inexorably to say that the only real security for the world and the most responsible position for people of faith in our two traditions is to call upon the United States and other countries of the world to, gradually and in a verifiable manner, finally eliminate these weapons from the face of the earth.
Endorsements
Endorsed by these participants
Twenty religious leaders and scholars endorsed the statement at the close of the consultation.
Asma Afsaruddin
Muslim
Associate Professor, Dept. of Arabic & Islamic Studies, University of Notre Dame
Sadida Athaullah
Muslim
Woodbridge, Virginia
Dr. Jamal Badawi
Muslim
Islamic Society of North America
Mohamed Elsanousi
Muslim
Director of Communications and Community Outreach, Islamic Society of North America
Muneer Fareed
Muslim
Associate Professor, Dept. of Near Eastern & Asian Studies, Wayne State University
Rev. Barbara Green
Presbyterian
Executive Director, Churches’ Center for Theology and Public Policy
Rabia Terri Harris
Muslim
Coordinator, Muslim Peace Fellowship
Sherman Jackson
Muslim
Professor of Arabic and Islamic Studies, Dept. of Near Eastern Studies, University of Michigan
Rev. Richard Killmer
Presbyterian
Program Director, Churches’ Center for Theology and Public Policy
Ibrahim M. Abdil-Mu’id Ramey
Muslim
Director of the Disarmament Program, Fellowship of Reconciliation
Anna Rhee
United Methodist
Board of Directors, Churches’ Center for Theology and Public Policy
Dr. Louay Safi
Muslim
Executive Director, Islamic Society of North America
Muhammad Shafiq, PhD
Muslim
Imam / Executive Director, Islamic Center of Rochester, NY; Executive Director, Center for Interfaith Studies and Dialogue, Nazareth College, Rochester
Dr. Muzammil H. Siddiqi
Muslim
Chairman, Fiqh Council of North America
Bishop Walter F. Sullivan
Roman Catholic
President of the Board of the Churches’ Center for Theology and Public Policy
Rev. Dr. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite
United Church of Christ
President and Professor of Theology, Chicago Theological Seminary
Joe Volk
Religious Society of Friends
Executive Secretary, Friends Committee on National Legislation
Dr. Jim Walsh
Executive Director, Managing the Atom, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Peter Weiderud
Church of Sweden
Director, Commission of the Churches on International Affairs, World Council of Churches
Dr. Christine Wing
Presbyterian
Member of South Presbyterian Church, Dobbs Ferry, NY
This statement reflects the views of the signatories and not necessarily those of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Organizations are listed for identification purposes only.
